As artificial intelligence and machine learning take center stage in modern decision-making, a surprising trend is gaining momentum across business, science, and design: a renewed interest in analog thinking in complex problem solving. While digital systems excel at speed and scale, they often fall short when nuance, ambiguity, or creativity are required.
Analog thinking—grounded in metaphors, mental models, physical reasoning, and cross-domain pattern recognition—is increasingly seen as a counterbalance to purely data-driven logic. And it’s not just nostalgic revivalism; it’s about adapting human reasoning to face problems that resist simple, linear solutions.
From product development to climate science to strategy consulting, analog frameworks are being used to approach uncertainty, complexity, and contradiction in ways that AI and purely digital methods currently cannot.
What Is Analog Thinking?
Analog thinking is the cognitive process of solving problems through relational similarity rather than numeric or binary logic. It’s what allows someone to say, “This startup reminds me of early Amazon” or “Solving this team conflict feels like tending a garden, not fixing a machine.”
It relies on:
- Metaphor and analogy
- Mental models from different domains
- Non-linear reasoning
- Physical intuition
- Pattern recognition outside of direct data
Analog thinking is often at play when we understand new experiences through comparison to familiar ones—especially in domains where formal rules don’t apply cleanly.
Why Analog Thinking Is Resurfacing Now
The resurgence of interest in analog thinking is not a rejection of AI, but a response to its current limitations. In 2024, McKinsey Global Institute published a report highlighting how companies increasingly seek human cognitive diversity—not just technical efficiency—for solving open-ended challenges.
Here’s what’s driving the trend:
1. Limits of Algorithmic Models
Even sophisticated AI models like GPT-4 or Gemini often fail when dealing with problems that require:
- Emotional context
- Moral ambiguity
- Unstructured decision spaces
As a result, organizations are looking for cognitive tools that support non-binary reasoning.
2. Cross-Disciplinary Innovation
Companies tackling climate tech, health diagnostics, and behavioral economics are relying more on interdisciplinary analogies—using biological systems to inspire organizational models or ecological principles to design supply chains.
3. Increased Complexity
The world isn’t getting simpler. From geopolitical shifts to economic disruptions to climate models, many current problems are complex, not complicated—which means they require adaptive, flexible, and non-linear reasoning. Analog thinking excels in these spaces where there is no “correct” answer, only a set of evolving trade-offs.
How Analog Thinking Helps With Complex Problem Solving
Analog thinking is particularly useful when data is incomplete, solutions are undefined, and systems are interdependent. Here’s how it works in action:
1. Pattern Matching from Diverse Domains
Great problem solvers often draw analogies from unrelated fields. Think of how engineers mimicked bird wings to design airplane flaps, or how social networks drew from epidemiology to model virality.
By comparing the unfamiliar to the familiar, analog thinkers can:
- Detect solutions in unrelated areas
- Build intuitive models where data is sparse
- Identify failure points before they occur
2. Mental Simulation and Physical Reasoning
Before digital twins or simulations, people used physical intuition. Architects still build cardboard models. Doctors still learn by practicing on mannequins. These are analog methods that deepen understanding through embodiment and spatial reasoning.
This is especially helpful when working with:
- 3D design
- Ergonomics
- Behavior modeling
3. Metaphor as a Thinking Tool
Metaphors are not just linguistic flourishes. They are how we map one domain onto another cognitively. Saying “a company is a living organism” vs. “a company is a machine” leads to entirely different approaches to leadership, hiring, and product development.
In strategic settings, choosing the right analogy can shape entire problem-solving frameworks.
Where Analog Thinking Beats Digital Thinking
| Context | Why Analog Thinking Wins |
|---|---|
| Early-Stage Innovation | Encourages speculative models not yet grounded in data |
| Organizational Design | Allows fluid thinking about roles, identity, and culture |
| Crisis Management | Adapts to incomplete info and shifting priorities |
| Education | Promotes deep understanding through storytelling and comparison |
| Ethics | Supports value-based, non-binary deliberation |
Practical Guide: How to Apply Analog Thinking
If you want to build analog thinking into your workflow, here’s a practical breakdown.
1. Maintain a Library of Mental Models
- Read across disciplines (biology, psychology, history)
- Note recurring structures (feedback loops, tipping points, power laws)
- Tools like Farnam Street can help
2. Use the “Analogy Sprint” Exercise
When faced with a hard problem:
- List 3 unrelated fields (e.g., jazz, agriculture, architecture)
- Ask: How might someone in this field solve this?
- Look for metaphors or frameworks to test
3. Sketch or Build Physical Models
Whether it’s sketching a workflow or using Lego to model a team structure, analog tools make abstract systems visible and tangible.
4. Host “Analogy Brainstorms”
In team settings, encourage wild comparisons:
- “What animal is this product?”
- “If this problem were a city, what kind of traffic problem would it have?”
This unlocks new angles and highlights assumptions.
Analog Thinking and AI: Rivals or Partners?
Interestingly, some of the most advanced AI labs are now trying to simulate analogical reasoning in machines. DeepMind’s recent work on relational networks and OpenAI’s research into analogical prompts suggest that even AI developers recognize the value of this human skill.
But machines are still far behind in:
- Emotional nuance
- Contextual fluidity
- Cross-domain abstraction
Which means analog thinking is not obsolete—it’s increasingly essential as a complement to digital logic.
Conclusion
As we face global-scale challenges that are ambiguous, interconnected, and evolving, analog thinking in complex problem solving is emerging as a crucial skill. It’s not about rejecting technology but enriching human reasoning with tools that data models alone can’t provide.
In a world addicted to metrics and automation, analog thought reminds us that insight often comes from metaphor, intuition, and experience. Those who learn to think analogically—especially in tandem with digital tools—are likely to be the most adaptive and innovative problem solvers of the next decade.
References
- McKinsey Global Institute. (2024). Reimagining Decision-Making in the Age of AI. https://www.mckinsey.com
- Harvard Business Review. (2023). Cross-Domain Thinking as a Catalyst for Innovation. https://hbr.org
- DeepMind Research. (2023). Learning Analogies: New Frontiers in AI. https://deepmind.com/blog
- Farnam Street. (n.d.). Mental Models for Better Thinking. https://fs.blog/mental-models
How to Map Mental Energy, Not Just Time 
